Why do Tea Partiers and other GOP
right-wingers work so hard to alienate their less dense, less obtuse fellow
citizens?
Why do
Tea Partiers and other GOP right-wingers fail to grasp that in a democracy the
majority rules?
And
what makes Tea Partiers and their fellow travelers so stubborn, so dedicated to
the perverse and counter-productive policy against raising taxes?
They
can be assured that the majority of U.S. citizens approve the plan the President
has put forward for averting nasty problems raised by the so-called Fiscal
Cliff. It seems the citizenry backs him
even though he has even modified his plan to suit republican preferences.
Mr. Obama has tried to be fair. He has been upfront. He
has been logical, consistent, and diplomatic. He knows that most of the nation
does not want him to yield on the points he ran on in the election and that
Americans don’t want the right-wingers to have their way.
And yet
the stubborn, selfish Johnny- one-notes in the GOP keep defying the President
and the majority of Americans.
Listen
up right wingers. America knows you are
the bad guys.
The President
himself provided insight into why the rightists oppose him. He said:
“I’m often reminded when I speak to the Republican leadership
that the majority of their caucus membership comes from districts that I lost.
And so sometimes they may not see an incentive in cooperating with me, in part
because they’re more concerned about challenges from a tea party candidate, or
challenges from the right, and cooperating with me may make them vulnerable. I
recognize that.
“But
goodness….If there’s one thing we should have after this week [in which the
slaughter of the innocent children in Connecticut took place] it should be a
sense of perspective about what’s important…Right now what the country needs is
for us to compromise, get a deficit reduction deal in place; make sure middle
class taxes don’t go up….”
Though
Mr. Obama’s words have most fair-minded people nodding in agreement, the House
no-compromise Republicans dismiss them.
So on the
first day of winter, a gray, wind-whipped day in our neighborhood, the House
right-wingers have presented the nation with a bleak outlook. The President’s rational
plan is still opposed by irrational Republicans.
The President—we sincerely hope—will stand
fast. Consequently the universal tax increase and drastic cuts in government
programs will take effect at the turn of the New Year. Many of us will see
thousands drained from their incomes.
The Republicans will have
engineered exactly what they’ve been arguing against—a tax hike. They will have
infuriated the nation and proved again there is such a thing as a tyranny of
the minority. Obduracy and disregard for the common good will have prevailed.
It seems likely, though, that when
the constituents of the hard-headed right-wingers feel the sting of new taxes
they’ll howl.
But wait. You know no politicians
would be dumb enough to outrage their constituents—do you think?
---Gus
Gribbin
For somebody who is a (retired) journalist/professor you might think you would be able to better argue your position. Instead what I see here is the typical arrogance and sense of self-superiority one comes to expect from those in your professions (journalist AND professor, double whammy). You know, the belief you obviously hold that you must be both smarter and generally better educated than those that don't share your political views, assuring yourself both of your correctness in thought as well as their ignorance?
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of obtuse, that one so highly educated and skilled in the rhetorical arts cannot recognize that those who believe that the crux of the fiscal problem is one of spending and not taxation might just have a viewpoint worth consideration speaks more to yourself than to them. Simple math of the type probably even tough to journalist undergrads makes it clear that taxes cannot be raised enough to put a dent in this deficit nightmare we find ourselves in and that in order to manage that deficit spending, including entitlement spending, has to be addressed in order for any solution to be reached. This, at least by my understanding, is the point that the people you are denigrating are trying to make. In what way is that not a valid argument? Well according to you it seems to not be a valid argument because "most" of the nation wants taxes raised. Really?
Out of curiosity, what percentage of your "most" do you think doesn't pay any income taxes to begin with, and exactly when did $200k-$250k become "wealthy"?
As for me, I'd be fine with a flat tax. *Everybody* needs to pay their "fair share" and have some skin in the game. Time for the freeloaders to kick in their "fair share" as well.
I might add that the irony of a journalist and professor censoring/moderating comments to their blog is not lost on me.
ReplyDelete