The GOP Far Right is Far Wrong on Immigration Reform


                Is there any issue the GOP’s far right Frightfuls can’t turn into a cauldron of contention?

                The correct answer is “No.!”

                The latest issue to fall victim to the Frightfuls’ lack of empathy, disregard for common sense, and intransigence is the discussion over reforming the nation’s immigration laws. The Far Right specifically rejects the notion that the 11,000,000 so-called “illegals” who have been living and working in the United States should be allowed to stay in their jobs, live in the nation, and earn their way to full citizenship.

                The President, and a number of legislators think those persons who entered the country illegally should remain and be offered a chance to become full -fledged citizens. A recent CBS News poll found that a majority of Americans (51 percent) agreed with the President. A Fox News poll found that 66 percent of Americans believe the undocumented should be allowed to apply for citizenship if they meet requirements.

                It’s common knowledge that most of the undocumented workers who have been living in the nation are hard- working and respectable. They have children who were born here and are U.S. citizens. And throughout their stay here they have suffered from the constant fear of arrest and deportation, and from the many disadvantages of non-citizenship. That is unrelenting punishment of a sort. The Frightfuls want to convert the punishment to life sentences.

                It’s only realistic—commonsensical—to acknowledge it would be impossible and horrendous for the national image to try and deport 11 million people. Otherwise what should be done? Would the Absurdists establish internment camps?  Create gulags, meaning slave labor camps? Certainly not.

                Among other things, the President would  increase border security, create a temporary guest-worker system,  require businesses to verify the citizenship status  of those they hire, reform  the visa-granting system, and increase incentives for admitting specially skilled foreigners. Importantly, he would establish a set of requirements for the undocumented to meet in order to gain citizenship.

                There are a number of solid and persuasive reasons to adopt the President’s thoughtful outline. David Brooks, The New York Times’ brilliant conservative columnist, argues, “The forlorn pundit doesn’t even have to make the humanitarian case that immigration reform would be a great victory for human dignity. The cold economic case by itself is so strong.” 

Mr. Brooks points out that illegal immigrants are not “socially disruptive.” They don’t “drain the federal budget.” And there is increasing evidence that they don’t even cause the wages of low-skill citizens to decline.

                It’s fair to say that when most people think of “illegal” immigrants they typically think of Mexicans and others from Latin countries, for in the past they have seemed to swarm across our southern border.  Americans can readily recall reports of “illegals” overwhelming U.S. hospital emergency rooms, of damaging crops, despoiling wells, and stealing poultry from border ranches. True some, maybe many, illegal border crossers created nasty mischief.

                But most did not.

                The typical illegal has been desperate to provide adequately for himself or his (or her) family. The illegal has done exactly what many U.S. citizens would do if caught in similar circumstances. Having run out of options at home and despairing of ever obtaining legal entry into their neighboring country, they risked intense suffering and death to cross relentless desert areas to a place where they might find work and survive.

                Many, if not most, of the illegals possess the fundamental qualities—the “family values”—the  GOP urges and presumably esteems. In general the border crossers have shown the kind of persistence and courage that most of us admire.

                Sure, some have created problems:  Some are criminals. Some are rowdies.  Some are unbelievably ignorant and, for instance, try to drive without licenses and without really knowing how to drive. A number have been forced to obtain fraudulent identification.

                For instance a small town Iowa police chief told Glimpse he had four guys in his lockup who were arrested for drunkenness and brawling. The chief said:

 “They all speak Mexican, which I don’t. They all have identical phony identification.  Each one is named Rodriquez. So what do you do?”

There is not much talk about the occasional Belgian student or the charming Irish bartender who has overstayed his visitor’s visa for a decade or so.  We don’t bother much about such folks.

No, the unwanted illegal whom the Frightfuls want to punish rather than help is typically brown or black, and poor, and needy, and often desperate.

There’s a lady standing at one entry to America. She stands tall with a torch in her bronze hand. On the pedestal at her feet , are words the Congressional Frightfuls should heed.  They say:

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

For heaven’s sake Congress, give 11,000,000 of our neighbors a break.

                         --Gus Gribbin

                >> The David Brooks column on immigration is titled “The Easy Problem.” It appeared on the Times Op- Ed Page on Friday 2/1/13.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment