About storms, climate, fools, and ( yes) Senator Inhofe Again


            Abe Lincoln put it this way:

            “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”

            How wonderfully Abe’s words apply to that marvel of Senatorial sagacity, James M. Inhofe, the Oklahoma Republican

            Surely you remember Mr. Inhofe?

He’s the Senate’s star climate change doubter and oil industry robot who claims climate change is a hoax. He calls climate scientists “conspirators.”

             Mr. Inhofe’s latest stunner came following the tragic tornado in Moore, a suburban town in the Senator’s home state.

             Because the Senator had orated against spending $50 billion in emergency funding for victims of Hurricane sandy, reporters asked if he would back such funding for Oklahoma’s victims. He said he would because:

 “That [Sandy relief spending] was totally different…. Everybody was getting in and exploiting the tragedy that took place.  That won’t happen in Oklahoma.”

            In other words, Oklahomans are more virtuous than New Yorkers, New Jerseyites, and other East Coast victims.

            That aside, Inhofe at least condescended to help the victims. The other Oklahoma Senator, Republican Tom Coburn, opposed emergency relief unless the expenditure was offset by cuts in other federal spending.

            There seems to be total denial among climate change deniers that emergency funding is likely to become even more common than it is. Not because of rip offs—though rip offs there may be—but because the rise in global temperatures warms the seas and generates more vicious storms.

            Of course, regardless of scientific studies and observable facts, Senator Inhofe and his ilk will remain unconvinced. As Benjamin Franklin observed, “A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.”

            Even so, there is more and more reason to be convinced.  Reporting on a recent report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA Today’s Doyle Rice wrote:

            “Global warming has already doubled the chance of storms like Katrina, according to the study, which was led by climate scientist Aslak Grinstsed of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.”

            The cheering news is that the number of climate change disbelievers has dwindled. The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication reports that between 2010 and 2012 the number of doubters dropped from 16 percent of the American population to 8 percent. At the same time the number of Americans ”alarmed” by climate change has climbed ten percent.

            Overall 63 percent of Americans believe in climate change and its effects, and the Yalies report that those who believe in global warming, “are more certain of their convictions than those who do not.”

            It’s not clear that Senator Inhofe was counted among those less certain “deniers.” Probably not. And given his coziness with Big Oil, he’s unlikely to waver especially since, as Yale studies indicate:

             “Half or more [of climate change believers] favor the elimination of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, and oppose the elimination of subsidies to renewable energy companies.”

            As many see it, only a fool would oppose subsidizing renewable energy companies given the facts about the rise of carbon dioxide caused by fossil fuel and the damage it causes.

But as you may already know, Senator Inhofe has championed opposition  to renewable energy company subsidies while fighting for continues subsidies to oil companies.

                                                                                    ----Gus Gribbin

>         Doyle Rice’s USA Today article appeared on March 18, 2013.

No comments:

Post a Comment